Head-to-Head Analysis

Cesar dressing vs Half and Half

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Cesar dressing

Cesar dressing

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Half and Half

Half and Half

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
1230 kcal
Energy
133 kcal
11.1g
Sugars
3.3g
122g
Fat
10g
11.1g
Protein
3.3g
0g
Salt
0.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Cesar dressing and Half and Half side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Cesar dressing is the more energy-dense option here, packing 1097 more calories per 100g than Half and Half. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Cesar dressing contains significantly more sugar (11.1g) compared to the milder Half and Half (3.33g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Half and Half is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Cesar dressing offers a protein boost with 11.1g per 100g, outperforming Half and Half in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Cesar dressing or Half and Half?

It depends on your goals. Cesar dressing has 1230 calories, while Half and Half has 133 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Cesar dressing vegan?

No, Cesar dressing is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Cesar dressing and Half and Half?

There is a difference of 1097 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.