Head-to-Head Analysis

CF Low moisture part-skim finely shredded mozzarella natural cheese, mozzarella vs Colby Jack, Natural Cheese

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of CF Low moisture part-skim finely shredded mozzarella natural cheese, mozzarella

CF Low moisture part-skim finely shredded mozzarella natural cheese, mozzarella

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Colby Jack, Natural Cheese

Colby Jack, Natural Cheese

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
294 kcal
Energy
428.6 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
20.6g
Fat
32.1g
23.5g
Protein
25g
1.5g
Salt
1.7g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing CF Low moisture part-skim finely shredded mozzarella natural cheese, mozzarella and Colby Jack, Natural Cheese side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, CF Low moisture part-skim finely shredded mozzarella natural cheese, mozzarella is the clear winner. With 135 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: CF Low moisture part-skim finely shredded mozzarella natural cheese, mozzarella or Colby Jack, Natural Cheese?

It depends on your goals. CF Low moisture part-skim finely shredded mozzarella natural cheese, mozzarella has 294 calories, while Colby Jack, Natural Cheese has 428.57 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is CF Low moisture part-skim finely shredded mozzarella natural cheese, mozzarella vegan?

No, CF Low moisture part-skim finely shredded mozzarella natural cheese, mozzarella is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between CF Low moisture part-skim finely shredded mozzarella natural cheese, mozzarella and Colby Jack, Natural Cheese?

There is a difference of 135 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.