Head-to-Head Analysis

Chíaluka vs Masoor Malka

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Chíaluka

Chíaluka

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Masoor Malka

Masoor Malka

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
376 kcal
Energy
354 kcal
41.2g
Sugars
2.1g
6.3g
Fat
2.1g
7.3g
Protein
22.9g
0g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Chíaluka and Masoor Malka side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Chíaluka is the more energy-dense option here, packing 22 more calories per 100g than Masoor Malka. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Chíaluka contains significantly more sugar (41.2g) compared to the milder Masoor Malka (2.08g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Masoor Malka is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Chíaluka or Masoor Malka?

It depends on your goals. Chíaluka has 376 calories, while Masoor Malka has 354 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Chíaluka vegan?

No, Chíaluka is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Chíaluka and Masoor Malka?

There is a difference of 22 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.