Head-to-Head Analysis

Chana Masala Bowl vs Spongebob squarepants chicken breast nuggets

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Chana Masala Bowl

Chana Masala Bowl

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Spongebob squarepants chicken breast nuggets

Spongebob squarepants chicken breast nuggets

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
408.5 kcal
Energy
180.7 kcal
4.2g
Sugars
6.4g
12.7g
Fat
7.2g
16.9g
Protein
5.6g
2g
Salt
1.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Chana Masala Bowl and Spongebob squarepants chicken breast nuggets side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Chana Masala Bowl is the more energy-dense option here, packing 228 more calories per 100g than Spongebob squarepants chicken breast nuggets. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Chana Masala Bowl takes the lead with only 4.2253521126761g of sugar per 100g, whereas Spongebob squarepants chicken breast nuggets contains 6.425702811245g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Chana Masala Bowl offers a protein boost with 16.901408450704g per 100g, outperforming Spongebob squarepants chicken breast nuggets in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Chana Masala Bowl or Spongebob squarepants chicken breast nuggets?

It depends on your goals. Chana Masala Bowl has 408.45070422535 calories, while Spongebob squarepants chicken breast nuggets has 180.72289156627 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Chana Masala Bowl vegan?

No, Chana Masala Bowl is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Chana Masala Bowl and Spongebob squarepants chicken breast nuggets?

There is a difference of 228 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.