Head-to-Head Analysis

Chewable Bariatric Multivitamin Tropical Berry Flavored vs California raisins covered in chocolate

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Chewable Bariatric Multivitamin Tropical Berry Flavored

Chewable Bariatric Multivitamin Tropical Berry Flavored

Not Vegan
VS
Package of California raisins covered in chocolate

California raisins covered in chocolate

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
0 kcal
Energy
425 kcal
0g
Sugars
62.6g
0g
Fat
17.9g
0g
Protein
4.5g
0g
Salt
0.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Chewable Bariatric Multivitamin Tropical Berry Flavored and California raisins covered in chocolate side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Chewable Bariatric Multivitamin Tropical Berry Flavored is the clear winner. With 425 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Chewable Bariatric Multivitamin Tropical Berry Flavored takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas California raisins covered in chocolate contains 62.64g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Chewable Bariatric Multivitamin Tropical Berry Flavored or California raisins covered in chocolate?

Chewable Bariatric Multivitamin Tropical Berry Flavored appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Chewable Bariatric Multivitamin Tropical Berry Flavored vegan?

No, Chewable Bariatric Multivitamin Tropical Berry Flavored is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Chewable Bariatric Multivitamin Tropical Berry Flavored and California raisins covered in chocolate?

There is a difference of 425 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.