Head-to-Head Analysis

Chicken Breast Tenders (Free Range, Air Chilled) vs Sesame Pistachio

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Chicken Breast Tenders (Free Range, Air Chilled)

Chicken Breast Tenders (Free Range, Air Chilled)

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Sesame Pistachio

Sesame Pistachio

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
97 kcal
Energy
40 kcal
0g
Sugars
5g
1.3g
Fat
2g
22g
Protein
1g
0.2g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Chicken Breast Tenders (Free Range, Air Chilled) and Sesame Pistachio side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Chicken Breast Tenders (Free Range, Air Chilled) is the more energy-dense option here, packing 57 more calories per 100g than Sesame Pistachio. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Chicken Breast Tenders (Free Range, Air Chilled) takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Sesame Pistachio contains 5g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Chicken Breast Tenders (Free Range, Air Chilled) offers a protein boost with 22g per 100g, outperforming Sesame Pistachio in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Chicken Breast Tenders (Free Range, Air Chilled) or Sesame Pistachio?

It depends on your goals. Chicken Breast Tenders (Free Range, Air Chilled) has 97 calories, while Sesame Pistachio has 40 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Chicken Breast Tenders (Free Range, Air Chilled) vegan?

No, Chicken Breast Tenders (Free Range, Air Chilled) is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Chicken Breast Tenders (Free Range, Air Chilled) and Sesame Pistachio?

There is a difference of 57 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.