Head-to-Head Analysis

Chicken Cobb Salas With Ranch Dressing vs Tom’s Nacho Rings

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Chicken Cobb Salas With Ranch Dressing

Chicken Cobb Salas With Ranch Dressing

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Tom’s Nacho Rings

Tom’s Nacho Rings

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
142 kcal
Energy
571.4 kcal
1.2g
Sugars
3.6g
10.7g
Fat
46.4g
8.8g
Protein
7.1g
1g
Salt
2.9g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Chicken Cobb Salas With Ranch Dressing and Tom’s Nacho Rings side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Chicken Cobb Salas With Ranch Dressing is the clear winner. With 429 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Chicken Cobb Salas With Ranch Dressing takes the lead with only 1.15g of sugar per 100g, whereas Tom’s Nacho Rings contains 3.5714285714286g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Chicken Cobb Salas With Ranch Dressing or Tom’s Nacho Rings?

Chicken Cobb Salas With Ranch Dressing appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Chicken Cobb Salas With Ranch Dressing vegan?

No, Chicken Cobb Salas With Ranch Dressing is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Chicken Cobb Salas With Ranch Dressing and Tom’s Nacho Rings?

There is a difference of 429 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.