Head-to-Head Analysis

Chicken Franks vs Applewood Smoked Bacon

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Chicken Franks

Chicken Franks

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Applewood Smoked Bacon

Applewood Smoked Bacon

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
250 kcal
Energy
571 kcal
0g
Sugars
7.1g
21.4g
Fat
50g
12.5g
Protein
28.6g
2.1g
Salt
5.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Chicken Franks and Applewood Smoked Bacon side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Chicken Franks is the clear winner. With 321 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Chicken Franks takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Applewood Smoked Bacon contains 7.14g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Chicken Franks or Applewood Smoked Bacon?

Chicken Franks appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Chicken Franks vegan?

No, Chicken Franks is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Chicken Franks and Applewood Smoked Bacon?

There is a difference of 321 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.