Chicken franks vs Sweet Brown Sugar Ham Steak
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Chicken franks
Sweet Brown Sugar Ham Steak
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Chicken franks and Sweet Brown Sugar Ham Steak side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
Chicken franks is the more energy-dense option here, packing 121 more calories per 100g than Sweet Brown Sugar Ham Steak. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
In terms of sugar control, Chicken franks takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Sweet Brown Sugar Ham Steak contains 5.8823529411765g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Chicken franks or Sweet Brown Sugar Ham Steak?
It depends on your goals. Chicken franks has 250 calories, while Sweet Brown Sugar Ham Steak has 129.41176470588 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Chicken franks vegan?
No, Chicken franks is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Chicken franks and Sweet Brown Sugar Ham Steak?
There is a difference of 121 calories per 100g between the two products.
