Head-to-Head Analysis

Chicken & Maple Breakfast Sausage Patties vs BEEF CHORIZO

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Chicken & Maple Breakfast Sausage Patties

Chicken & Maple Breakfast Sausage Patties

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of BEEF CHORIZO

BEEF CHORIZO

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
181.8 kcal
Energy
414 kcal
6.1g
Sugars
0g
12.1g
Fat
40g
15.2g
Protein
10g
1.7g
Salt
1.9g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Chicken & Maple Breakfast Sausage Patties and BEEF CHORIZO side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Chicken & Maple Breakfast Sausage Patties is the clear winner. With 232 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Chicken & Maple Breakfast Sausage Patties contains significantly more sugar (6.06060606060606g) compared to the milder BEEF CHORIZO (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, BEEF CHORIZO is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Chicken & Maple Breakfast Sausage Patties offers a protein boost with 15.1515151515152g per 100g, outperforming BEEF CHORIZO in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Chicken & Maple Breakfast Sausage Patties or BEEF CHORIZO?

It depends on your goals. Chicken & Maple Breakfast Sausage Patties has 181.818181818182 calories, while BEEF CHORIZO has 414 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Chicken & Maple Breakfast Sausage Patties vegan?

No, Chicken & Maple Breakfast Sausage Patties is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Chicken & Maple Breakfast Sausage Patties and BEEF CHORIZO?

There is a difference of 232 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.