Head-to-Head Analysis

Chicken & Maple Breakfast Sausage Patties vs Beef & peppers

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Chicken & Maple Breakfast Sausage Patties

Chicken & Maple Breakfast Sausage Patties

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Beef & peppers

Beef & peppers

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
200 kcal
Energy
118.9 kcal
5g
Sugars
1.8g
10g
Fat
1.8g
20g
Protein
4g
1.6g
Salt
0.8g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Chicken & Maple Breakfast Sausage Patties and Beef & peppers side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Chicken & Maple Breakfast Sausage Patties is the more energy-dense option here, packing 81 more calories per 100g than Beef & peppers. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Chicken & Maple Breakfast Sausage Patties contains significantly more sugar (5g) compared to the milder Beef & peppers (1.76g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Beef & peppers is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Chicken & Maple Breakfast Sausage Patties offers a protein boost with 20g per 100g, outperforming Beef & peppers in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Chicken & Maple Breakfast Sausage Patties or Beef & peppers?

It depends on your goals. Chicken & Maple Breakfast Sausage Patties has 200 calories, while Beef & peppers has 118.94 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Chicken & Maple Breakfast Sausage Patties vegan?

No, Chicken & Maple Breakfast Sausage Patties is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Chicken & Maple Breakfast Sausage Patties and Beef & peppers?

There is a difference of 81 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.