Head-to-Head Analysis

Chicken Snack Stick - Original Salt & Pepper vs Beef Jerky

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Chicken Snack Stick - Original Salt & Pepper

Chicken Snack Stick - Original Salt & Pepper

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Beef Jerky

Beef Jerky

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
179 kcal
Energy
0 kcal
3.6g
Sugars
0g
7.1g
Fat
0g
21.4g
Protein
0g
2.9g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Chicken Snack Stick - Original Salt & Pepper and Beef Jerky side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Chicken Snack Stick - Original Salt & Pepper is the more energy-dense option here, packing 179 more calories per 100g than Beef Jerky. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Chicken Snack Stick - Original Salt & Pepper contains significantly more sugar (3.57g) compared to the milder Beef Jerky (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Beef Jerky is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Chicken Snack Stick - Original Salt & Pepper offers a protein boost with 21.4g per 100g, outperforming Beef Jerky in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Chicken Snack Stick - Original Salt & Pepper or Beef Jerky?

It depends on your goals. Chicken Snack Stick - Original Salt & Pepper has 179 calories, while Beef Jerky has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Chicken Snack Stick - Original Salt & Pepper vegan?

No, Chicken Snack Stick - Original Salt & Pepper is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Chicken Snack Stick - Original Salt & Pepper and Beef Jerky?

There is a difference of 179 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.