Head-to-Head Analysis

Chicken & Steak Fajita Burrito vs Sea salt & vinegar potato chips

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Chicken & Steak Fajita Burrito

Chicken & Steak Fajita Burrito

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Sea salt & vinegar potato chips

Sea salt & vinegar potato chips

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
197 kcal
Energy
500 kcal
2.1g
Sugars
0g
6.3g
Fat
25g
9.2g
Protein
7.1g
1.2g
Salt
2.4g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Chicken & Steak Fajita Burrito and Sea salt & vinegar potato chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Chicken & Steak Fajita Burrito is the clear winner. With 303 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Chicken & Steak Fajita Burrito contains significantly more sugar (2.11g) compared to the milder Sea salt & vinegar potato chips (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Sea salt & vinegar potato chips is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Chicken & Steak Fajita Burrito offers a protein boost with 9.15g per 100g, outperforming Sea salt & vinegar potato chips in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Chicken & Steak Fajita Burrito or Sea salt & vinegar potato chips?

It depends on your goals. Chicken & Steak Fajita Burrito has 197 calories, while Sea salt & vinegar potato chips has 500 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Chicken & Steak Fajita Burrito vegan?

No, Chicken & Steak Fajita Burrito is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Chicken & Steak Fajita Burrito and Sea salt & vinegar potato chips?

There is a difference of 303 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.