Head-to-Head Analysis

Chicken Stock vs Sliced California Ripe Olives

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Chicken Stock

Chicken Stock

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Sliced California Ripe Olives

Sliced California Ripe Olives

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
375 kcal
Energy
93.8 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
0g
Fat
9.4g
100g
Protein
0g
25g
Salt
0.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Chicken Stock and Sliced California Ripe Olives side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Chicken Stock is the more energy-dense option here, packing 281 more calories per 100g than Sliced California Ripe Olives. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

Looking to build muscle? Chicken Stock offers a protein boost with 100g per 100g, outperforming Sliced California Ripe Olives in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Chicken Stock or Sliced California Ripe Olives?

It depends on your goals. Chicken Stock has 375 calories, while Sliced California Ripe Olives has 93.75 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Chicken Stock vegan?

No, Chicken Stock is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Chicken Stock and Sliced California Ripe Olives?

There is a difference of 281 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.