Head-to-Head Analysis

Chicken stock for cooking, original vs Sweet corn

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Chicken stock for cooking, original

Chicken stock for cooking, original

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Sweet corn

Sweet corn

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
12 kcal
Energy
48 kcal
0.4g
Sugars
4g
0.2g
Fat
0.8g
2.1g
Protein
1.6g
0.4g
Salt
0.4g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Chicken stock for cooking, original and Sweet corn side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Chicken stock for cooking, original is the clear winner. With 36 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Chicken stock for cooking, original takes the lead with only 0.42g of sugar per 100g, whereas Sweet corn contains 4g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Chicken stock for cooking, original or Sweet corn?

Chicken stock for cooking, original appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Chicken stock for cooking, original vegan?

No, Chicken stock for cooking, original is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Chicken stock for cooking, original and Sweet corn?

There is a difference of 36 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.