Chicken stock for cooking, original vs Wild Albacore Tuna
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Chicken stock for cooking, original
Wild Albacore Tuna
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Chicken stock for cooking, original and Wild Albacore Tuna side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Chicken stock for cooking, original is the clear winner. With 115 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Chicken stock for cooking, original or Wild Albacore Tuna?
It depends on your goals. Chicken stock for cooking, original has 12 calories, while Wild Albacore Tuna has 127 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Chicken stock for cooking, original vegan?
No, Chicken stock for cooking, original is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Chicken stock for cooking, original and Wild Albacore Tuna?
There is a difference of 115 calories per 100g between the two products.
