Head-to-Head Analysis

Chicken Tenderloins vs Paprika Nuts & Mesquite Smoked Sea Salt With Almonds & Cashews Bar

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Chicken Tenderloins

Chicken Tenderloins

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Paprika Nuts & Mesquite Smoked Sea Salt With Almonds & Cashews Bar

Paprika Nuts & Mesquite Smoked Sea Salt With Almonds & Cashews Bar

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
97 kcal
Energy
450 kcal
0g
Sugars
10g
0g
Fat
35g
22.9g
Protein
15g
0.1g
Salt
0.9g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Chicken Tenderloins and Paprika Nuts & Mesquite Smoked Sea Salt With Almonds & Cashews Bar side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Chicken Tenderloins is the clear winner. With 353 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Chicken Tenderloins takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Paprika Nuts & Mesquite Smoked Sea Salt With Almonds & Cashews Bar contains 10g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Chicken Tenderloins offers a protein boost with 22.9g per 100g, outperforming Paprika Nuts & Mesquite Smoked Sea Salt With Almonds & Cashews Bar in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Chicken Tenderloins or Paprika Nuts & Mesquite Smoked Sea Salt With Almonds & Cashews Bar?

Chicken Tenderloins appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Chicken Tenderloins vegan?

No, Chicken Tenderloins is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Chicken Tenderloins and Paprika Nuts & Mesquite Smoked Sea Salt With Almonds & Cashews Bar?

There is a difference of 353 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.