Head-to-Head Analysis

Chicken Tikka Masala Kati Street Wrap vs Microwave Popcorn Movie Theater Butter

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Chicken Tikka Masala Kati Street Wrap

Chicken Tikka Masala Kati Street Wrap

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Microwave Popcorn Movie Theater Butter

Microwave Popcorn Movie Theater Butter

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
239 kcal
Energy
1470 kcal
2.1g
Sugars
0g
9.9g
Fat
92.6g
13.4g
Protein
15.4g
1.4g
Salt
6.4g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Chicken Tikka Masala Kati Street Wrap and Microwave Popcorn Movie Theater Butter side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Chicken Tikka Masala Kati Street Wrap is the clear winner. With 1231 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Chicken Tikka Masala Kati Street Wrap contains significantly more sugar (2.11g) compared to the milder Microwave Popcorn Movie Theater Butter (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Microwave Popcorn Movie Theater Butter is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Chicken Tikka Masala Kati Street Wrap or Microwave Popcorn Movie Theater Butter?

It depends on your goals. Chicken Tikka Masala Kati Street Wrap has 239 calories, while Microwave Popcorn Movie Theater Butter has 1470 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Chicken Tikka Masala Kati Street Wrap vegan?

No, Chicken Tikka Masala Kati Street Wrap is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Chicken Tikka Masala Kati Street Wrap and Microwave Popcorn Movie Theater Butter?

There is a difference of 1231 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.