Head-to-Head Analysis

Chicken Tikka Masala Rice Bowl vs No Sugar Added Chocolate Wafers

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Chicken Tikka Masala Rice Bowl

Chicken Tikka Masala Rice Bowl

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of No Sugar Added Chocolate Wafers

No Sugar Added Chocolate Wafers

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
106 kcal
Energy
480 kcal
2.2g
Sugars
0g
1.6g
Fat
32g
9.6g
Protein
4g
0.7g
Salt
0.4g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Chicken Tikka Masala Rice Bowl and No Sugar Added Chocolate Wafers side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Chicken Tikka Masala Rice Bowl is the clear winner. With 374 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Chicken Tikka Masala Rice Bowl contains significantly more sugar (2.24g) compared to the milder No Sugar Added Chocolate Wafers (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, No Sugar Added Chocolate Wafers is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Chicken Tikka Masala Rice Bowl offers a protein boost with 9.62g per 100g, outperforming No Sugar Added Chocolate Wafers in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Chicken Tikka Masala Rice Bowl or No Sugar Added Chocolate Wafers?

It depends on your goals. Chicken Tikka Masala Rice Bowl has 106 calories, while No Sugar Added Chocolate Wafers has 480 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Chicken Tikka Masala Rice Bowl vegan?

No, Chicken Tikka Masala Rice Bowl is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Chicken Tikka Masala Rice Bowl and No Sugar Added Chocolate Wafers?

There is a difference of 374 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.