Chicken tortellini vs Vegan pho shirataki konjac noodles with an aromatic traditional vietnamese broth
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Chicken tortellini

Vegan pho shirataki konjac noodles with an aromatic traditional vietnamese broth
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Chicken tortellini and Vegan pho shirataki konjac noodles with an aromatic traditional vietnamese broth side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
Chicken tortellini is the more energy-dense option here, packing 234 more calories per 100g than Vegan pho shirataki konjac noodles with an aromatic traditional vietnamese broth. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
In terms of sugar control, Chicken tortellini takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Vegan pho shirataki konjac noodles with an aromatic traditional vietnamese broth contains 1.86g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.
Looking to build muscle? Chicken tortellini offers a protein boost with 11.5g per 100g, outperforming Vegan pho shirataki konjac noodles with an aromatic traditional vietnamese broth in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Chicken tortellini or Vegan pho shirataki konjac noodles with an aromatic traditional vietnamese broth?
It depends on your goals. Chicken tortellini has 257 calories, while Vegan pho shirataki konjac noodles with an aromatic traditional vietnamese broth has 23.3 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Chicken tortellini vegan?
No, Chicken tortellini is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Chicken tortellini and Vegan pho shirataki konjac noodles with an aromatic traditional vietnamese broth?
There is a difference of 234 calories per 100g between the two products.




