Head-to-Head Analysis

Chicken Wings with Spicy Dill Dry Rub vs Skinless Beef Franks

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Chicken Wings with Spicy Dill Dry Rub

Chicken Wings with Spicy Dill Dry Rub

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Skinless Beef Franks

Skinless Beef Franks

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
216 kcal
Energy
326 kcal
2.3g
Sugars
0g
12.5g
Fat
27.9g
15.9g
Protein
11.6g
1.5g
Salt
2.4g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Chicken Wings with Spicy Dill Dry Rub and Skinless Beef Franks side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Chicken Wings with Spicy Dill Dry Rub is the clear winner. With 110 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Chicken Wings with Spicy Dill Dry Rub contains significantly more sugar (2.27g) compared to the milder Skinless Beef Franks (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Skinless Beef Franks is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Chicken Wings with Spicy Dill Dry Rub offers a protein boost with 15.9g per 100g, outperforming Skinless Beef Franks in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Chicken Wings with Spicy Dill Dry Rub or Skinless Beef Franks?

It depends on your goals. Chicken Wings with Spicy Dill Dry Rub has 216 calories, while Skinless Beef Franks has 326 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Chicken Wings with Spicy Dill Dry Rub vegan?

No, Chicken Wings with Spicy Dill Dry Rub is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Chicken Wings with Spicy Dill Dry Rub and Skinless Beef Franks?

There is a difference of 110 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.