Chickpea Fusilli vs Sliced Kalamata Greek Olives
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Chickpea Fusilli

Sliced Kalamata Greek Olives
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Chickpea Fusilli and Sliced Kalamata Greek Olives side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Chickpea Fusilli is the clear winner. With 115 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
However, watch out for the sugar content. Chickpea Fusilli contains significantly more sugar (3.18g) compared to the milder Sliced Kalamata Greek Olives (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Sliced Kalamata Greek Olives is undeniably the healthier pick.
Looking to build muscle? Chickpea Fusilli offers a protein boost with 4.95g per 100g, outperforming Sliced Kalamata Greek Olives in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Chickpea Fusilli or Sliced Kalamata Greek Olives?
It depends on your goals. Chickpea Fusilli has 166 calories, while Sliced Kalamata Greek Olives has 281 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Chickpea Fusilli vegan?
No, Chickpea Fusilli is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Chickpea Fusilli and Sliced Kalamata Greek Olives?
There is a difference of 115 calories per 100g between the two products.




