Head-to-Head Analysis

Chile Lime Flavored Fried Pork Rinds vs Cheddar & sour cream rippled potato chips

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Chile Lime Flavored Fried Pork Rinds

Chile Lime Flavored Fried Pork Rinds

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Cheddar & sour cream rippled potato chips

Cheddar & sour cream rippled potato chips

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
500 kcal
Energy
535.7 kcal
0g
Sugars
3.6g
28.6g
Fat
32.1g
64.3g
Protein
7.1g
5.9g
Salt
1.1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Chile Lime Flavored Fried Pork Rinds and Cheddar & sour cream rippled potato chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Chile Lime Flavored Fried Pork Rinds is the clear winner. With 36 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Chile Lime Flavored Fried Pork Rinds takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Cheddar & sour cream rippled potato chips contains 3.5714g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Chile Lime Flavored Fried Pork Rinds offers a protein boost with 64.3g per 100g, outperforming Cheddar & sour cream rippled potato chips in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Chile Lime Flavored Fried Pork Rinds or Cheddar & sour cream rippled potato chips?

Chile Lime Flavored Fried Pork Rinds appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Chile Lime Flavored Fried Pork Rinds vegan?

No, Chile Lime Flavored Fried Pork Rinds is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Chile Lime Flavored Fried Pork Rinds and Cheddar & sour cream rippled potato chips?

There is a difference of 36 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.