Head-to-Head Analysis

Chilean Atlantic Salmon vs Wild Caught Light Tuna in Water

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Chilean Atlantic Salmon

Chilean Atlantic Salmon

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Wild Caught Light Tuna in Water

Wild Caught Light Tuna in Water

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
0 kcal
Energy
94.1 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
18.5g
Fat
0.6g
21.2g
Protein
22.4g
0.1g
Salt
1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Chilean Atlantic Salmon and Wild Caught Light Tuna in Water side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Chilean Atlantic Salmon is the clear winner. With 94 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Chilean Atlantic Salmon or Wild Caught Light Tuna in Water?

It depends on your goals. Chilean Atlantic Salmon has 0 calories, while Wild Caught Light Tuna in Water has 94.1 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Chilean Atlantic Salmon vegan?

No, Chilean Atlantic Salmon is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Chilean Atlantic Salmon and Wild Caught Light Tuna in Water?

There is a difference of 94 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.