Chili Garlic Edamame vs Italian-Style Petite Diced Tomatoes with basil, garlic & oregano
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Chili Garlic Edamame

Italian-Style Petite Diced Tomatoes with basil, garlic & oregano
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Chili Garlic Edamame and Italian-Style Petite Diced Tomatoes with basil, garlic & oregano side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
Chili Garlic Edamame is the more energy-dense option here, packing 124 more calories per 100g than Italian-Style Petite Diced Tomatoes with basil, garlic & oregano. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
However, watch out for the sugar content. Chili Garlic Edamame contains significantly more sugar (3.6g) compared to the milder Italian-Style Petite Diced Tomatoes with basil, garlic & oregano (2.38g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Italian-Style Petite Diced Tomatoes with basil, garlic & oregano is undeniably the healthier pick.
Looking to build muscle? Chili Garlic Edamame offers a protein boost with 10.8g per 100g, outperforming Italian-Style Petite Diced Tomatoes with basil, garlic & oregano in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Chili Garlic Edamame or Italian-Style Petite Diced Tomatoes with basil, garlic & oregano?
It depends on your goals. Chili Garlic Edamame has 144 calories, while Italian-Style Petite Diced Tomatoes with basil, garlic & oregano has 19.8 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Chili Garlic Edamame vegan?
No, Chili Garlic Edamame is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Chili Garlic Edamame and Italian-Style Petite Diced Tomatoes with basil, garlic & oregano?
There is a difference of 124 calories per 100g between the two products.




