Head-to-Head Analysis

Chili Seasoning Mix vs Naturals Simply Salted Gourmet Popping Corn

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Chili Seasoning Mix

Chili Seasoning Mix

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Naturals Simply Salted Gourmet Popping Corn

Naturals Simply Salted Gourmet Popping Corn

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
273 kcal
Energy
486 kcal
18.2g
Sugars
0g
0g
Fat
31.4g
9.1g
Protein
6.9g
15.5g
Salt
3.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Chili Seasoning Mix and Naturals Simply Salted Gourmet Popping Corn side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Chili Seasoning Mix is the clear winner. With 213 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Chili Seasoning Mix contains significantly more sugar (18.2g) compared to the milder Naturals Simply Salted Gourmet Popping Corn (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Naturals Simply Salted Gourmet Popping Corn is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Chili Seasoning Mix offers a protein boost with 9.09g per 100g, outperforming Naturals Simply Salted Gourmet Popping Corn in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Chili Seasoning Mix or Naturals Simply Salted Gourmet Popping Corn?

It depends on your goals. Chili Seasoning Mix has 273 calories, while Naturals Simply Salted Gourmet Popping Corn has 486 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Chili Seasoning Mix vegan?

No, Chili Seasoning Mix is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Chili Seasoning Mix and Naturals Simply Salted Gourmet Popping Corn?

There is a difference of 213 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.