Chili with no beans vs Southwest chopped salad kit
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Chili with no beans
Southwest chopped salad kit
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Chili with no beans and Southwest chopped salad kit side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Chili with no beans is the clear winner. With 13 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
In terms of sugar control, Chili with no beans takes the lead with only 1.271186440678g of sugar per 100g, whereas Southwest chopped salad kit contains 3g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.
Looking to build muscle? Chili with no beans offers a protein boost with 8.4745762711864g per 100g, outperforming Southwest chopped salad kit in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Chili with no beans or Southwest chopped salad kit?
Chili with no beans appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.
Is Chili with no beans vegan?
No, Chili with no beans is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Chili with no beans and Southwest chopped salad kit?
There is a difference of 13 calories per 100g between the two products.
