Head-to-Head Analysis

Chinese Fragile vs Classic Panettone

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Chinese Fragile

Chinese Fragile

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Classic Panettone

Classic Panettone

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
522 kcal
Energy
373.5 kcal
44.4g
Sugars
21.7g
29.6g
Fat
15.7g
6.7g
Protein
6g
0.5g
Salt
0.4g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Chinese Fragile and Classic Panettone side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Chinese Fragile is the more energy-dense option here, packing 149 more calories per 100g than Classic Panettone. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Chinese Fragile contains significantly more sugar (44.4g) compared to the milder Classic Panettone (21.686746987952g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Classic Panettone is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Chinese Fragile or Classic Panettone?

It depends on your goals. Chinese Fragile has 522 calories, while Classic Panettone has 373.49397590361 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Chinese Fragile vegan?

No, Chinese Fragile is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Chinese Fragile and Classic Panettone?

There is a difference of 149 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.