Head-to-Head Analysis

Chipotle Chipotle Peppers in Adobo Sauce vs California Ripe Pitted Olives Medium

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Chipotle Chipotle Peppers in Adobo Sauce

Chipotle Chipotle Peppers in Adobo Sauce

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of California Ripe Pitted Olives Medium

California Ripe Pitted Olives Medium

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
67 kcal
Energy
100 kcal
6.7g
Sugars
0g
3.3g
Fat
10g
0g
Protein
0.9g
1.7g
Salt
0.9g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Chipotle Chipotle Peppers in Adobo Sauce and California Ripe Pitted Olives Medium side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Chipotle Chipotle Peppers in Adobo Sauce is the clear winner. With 33 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Chipotle Chipotle Peppers in Adobo Sauce contains significantly more sugar (6.67g) compared to the milder California Ripe Pitted Olives Medium (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, California Ripe Pitted Olives Medium is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Chipotle Chipotle Peppers in Adobo Sauce or California Ripe Pitted Olives Medium?

It depends on your goals. Chipotle Chipotle Peppers in Adobo Sauce has 67 calories, while California Ripe Pitted Olives Medium has 100 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Chipotle Chipotle Peppers in Adobo Sauce vegan?

No, Chipotle Chipotle Peppers in Adobo Sauce is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Chipotle Chipotle Peppers in Adobo Sauce and California Ripe Pitted Olives Medium?

There is a difference of 33 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.