Head-to-Head Analysis

Chips - 100% whole grain original vs Wiley wallaby licorice allsorts

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Chips - 100% whole grain original

Chips - 100% whole grain original

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Wiley wallaby licorice allsorts

Wiley wallaby licorice allsorts

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
494.1 kcal
Energy
367 kcal
8.2g
Sugars
56.7g
21.2g
Fat
1.7g
7.1g
Protein
3.3g
1.2g
Salt
0.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Chips - 100% whole grain original and Wiley wallaby licorice allsorts side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Chips - 100% whole grain original is the more energy-dense option here, packing 127 more calories per 100g than Wiley wallaby licorice allsorts. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Chips - 100% whole grain original takes the lead with only 8.2353g of sugar per 100g, whereas Wiley wallaby licorice allsorts contains 56.7g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Chips - 100% whole grain original offers a protein boost with 7.0588g per 100g, outperforming Wiley wallaby licorice allsorts in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Chips - 100% whole grain original or Wiley wallaby licorice allsorts?

It depends on your goals. Chips - 100% whole grain original has 494.1176 calories, while Wiley wallaby licorice allsorts has 367 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Chips - 100% whole grain original vegan?

No, Chips - 100% whole grain original is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Chips - 100% whole grain original and Wiley wallaby licorice allsorts?

There is a difference of 127 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.