Head-to-Head Analysis

Chocolat noir 82% vs Old El Paso Super Stuffer Shells 10 Count

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Chocolat noir 82%

Chocolat noir 82%

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Old El Paso Super Stuffer Shells 10 Count

Old El Paso Super Stuffer Shells 10 Count

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
585 kcal
Energy
486 kcal
15g
Sugars
0g
47g
Fat
21.6g
11.2g
Protein
5.4g
0g
Salt
1g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Chocolat noir 82% and Old El Paso Super Stuffer Shells 10 Count side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Chocolat noir 82% is the more energy-dense option here, packing 99 more calories per 100g than Old El Paso Super Stuffer Shells 10 Count. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Chocolat noir 82% contains significantly more sugar (15g) compared to the milder Old El Paso Super Stuffer Shells 10 Count (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Old El Paso Super Stuffer Shells 10 Count is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Chocolat noir 82% offers a protein boost with 11.2g per 100g, outperforming Old El Paso Super Stuffer Shells 10 Count in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Chocolat noir 82% or Old El Paso Super Stuffer Shells 10 Count?

It depends on your goals. Chocolat noir 82% has 585 calories, while Old El Paso Super Stuffer Shells 10 Count has 486 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Chocolat noir 82% vegan?

No, Chocolat noir 82% is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Chocolat noir 82% and Old El Paso Super Stuffer Shells 10 Count?

There is a difference of 99 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.