CHOCOLATE 2% REDUCED FAT ultra-filtered milk vs Low Sodium 100% Vegetable Juice
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
CHOCOLATE 2% REDUCED FAT ultra-filtered milk
Low Sodium 100% Vegetable Juice
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing CHOCOLATE 2% REDUCED FAT ultra-filtered milk and Low Sodium 100% Vegetable Juice side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
CHOCOLATE 2% REDUCED FAT ultra-filtered milk is the more energy-dense option here, packing 40 more calories per 100g than Low Sodium 100% Vegetable Juice. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.
However, watch out for the sugar content. CHOCOLATE 2% REDUCED FAT ultra-filtered milk contains significantly more sugar (5g) compared to the milder Low Sodium 100% Vegetable Juice (3.07g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Low Sodium 100% Vegetable Juice is undeniably the healthier pick.
Looking to build muscle? CHOCOLATE 2% REDUCED FAT ultra-filtered milk offers a protein boost with 5.42g per 100g, outperforming Low Sodium 100% Vegetable Juice in this category.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: CHOCOLATE 2% REDUCED FAT ultra-filtered milk or Low Sodium 100% Vegetable Juice?
It depends on your goals. CHOCOLATE 2% REDUCED FAT ultra-filtered milk has 58.3 calories, while Low Sodium 100% Vegetable Juice has 18.4 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is CHOCOLATE 2% REDUCED FAT ultra-filtered milk vegan?
No, CHOCOLATE 2% REDUCED FAT ultra-filtered milk is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between CHOCOLATE 2% REDUCED FAT ultra-filtered milk and Low Sodium 100% Vegetable Juice?
There is a difference of 40 calories per 100g between the two products.
