Head-to-Head Analysis

Chocolate Brownie ProteinBar vs Milk Chocolate Covered CASHEWS

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Chocolate Brownie ProteinBar

Chocolate Brownie ProteinBar

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Milk Chocolate Covered CASHEWS

Milk Chocolate Covered CASHEWS

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
317 kcal
Energy
0 kcal
3.3g
Sugars
0g
10g
Fat
0g
35g
Protein
0g
233g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Chocolate Brownie ProteinBar and Milk Chocolate Covered CASHEWS side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Chocolate Brownie ProteinBar is the more energy-dense option here, packing 317 more calories per 100g than Milk Chocolate Covered CASHEWS. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Chocolate Brownie ProteinBar contains significantly more sugar (3.33g) compared to the milder Milk Chocolate Covered CASHEWS (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Milk Chocolate Covered CASHEWS is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Chocolate Brownie ProteinBar offers a protein boost with 35g per 100g, outperforming Milk Chocolate Covered CASHEWS in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Chocolate Brownie ProteinBar or Milk Chocolate Covered CASHEWS?

It depends on your goals. Chocolate Brownie ProteinBar has 317 calories, while Milk Chocolate Covered CASHEWS has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Chocolate Brownie ProteinBar vegan?

No, Chocolate Brownie ProteinBar is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Chocolate Brownie ProteinBar and Milk Chocolate Covered CASHEWS?

There is a difference of 317 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.