Head-to-Head Analysis

Chocolate chip- bite size coockies vs Organic Sea Salt & Lime Tortilla Chips

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Chocolate chip- bite size coockies

Chocolate chip- bite size coockies

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Organic Sea Salt & Lime Tortilla Chips

Organic Sea Salt & Lime Tortilla Chips

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
500 kcal
Energy
464 kcal
32.1g
Sugars
0g
25g
Fat
25g
3.6g
Protein
7.1g
0.9g
Salt
0.6g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Chocolate chip- bite size coockies and Organic Sea Salt & Lime Tortilla Chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Chocolate chip- bite size coockies is the more energy-dense option here, packing 36 more calories per 100g than Organic Sea Salt & Lime Tortilla Chips. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Chocolate chip- bite size coockies contains significantly more sugar (32.1g) compared to the milder Organic Sea Salt & Lime Tortilla Chips (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Organic Sea Salt & Lime Tortilla Chips is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Chocolate chip- bite size coockies or Organic Sea Salt & Lime Tortilla Chips?

It depends on your goals. Chocolate chip- bite size coockies has 500 calories, while Organic Sea Salt & Lime Tortilla Chips has 464 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Chocolate chip- bite size coockies vegan?

No, Chocolate chip- bite size coockies is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Chocolate chip- bite size coockies and Organic Sea Salt & Lime Tortilla Chips?

There is a difference of 36 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.