Head-to-Head Analysis

Chocolate chip energy bars bars vs Mini Medjools Sweet & Salty Almond

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Chocolate chip energy bars bars

Chocolate chip energy bars bars

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Mini Medjools Sweet & Salty Almond

Mini Medjools Sweet & Salty Almond

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
367.7 kcal
Energy
325 kcal
30.9g
Sugars
65g
7.4g
Fat
5g
13.2g
Protein
2.5g
0.5g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Chocolate chip energy bars bars and Mini Medjools Sweet & Salty Almond side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Chocolate chip energy bars bars is the more energy-dense option here, packing 43 more calories per 100g than Mini Medjools Sweet & Salty Almond. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Chocolate chip energy bars bars takes the lead with only 30.88g of sugar per 100g, whereas Mini Medjools Sweet & Salty Almond contains 65g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Chocolate chip energy bars bars offers a protein boost with 13.24g per 100g, outperforming Mini Medjools Sweet & Salty Almond in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Chocolate chip energy bars bars or Mini Medjools Sweet & Salty Almond?

It depends on your goals. Chocolate chip energy bars bars has 367.65 calories, while Mini Medjools Sweet & Salty Almond has 325 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Chocolate chip energy bars bars vegan?

No, Chocolate chip energy bars bars is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Chocolate chip energy bars bars and Mini Medjools Sweet & Salty Almond?

There is a difference of 43 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.