chocolate covered Sea Salt Butterscotch caramels vs sweet and salty
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
chocolate covered Sea Salt Butterscotch caramels
sweet and salty
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing chocolate covered Sea Salt Butterscotch caramels and sweet and salty side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, chocolate covered Sea Salt Butterscotch caramels is the clear winner. With 57 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
However, watch out for the sugar content. chocolate covered Sea Salt Butterscotch caramels contains significantly more sugar (46.7g) compared to the milder sweet and salty (31.428571428571g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, sweet and salty is undeniably the healthier pick.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: chocolate covered Sea Salt Butterscotch caramels or sweet and salty?
It depends on your goals. chocolate covered Sea Salt Butterscotch caramels has 400 calories, while sweet and salty has 457.14285714286 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is chocolate covered Sea Salt Butterscotch caramels vegan?
No, chocolate covered Sea Salt Butterscotch caramels is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between chocolate covered Sea Salt Butterscotch caramels and sweet and salty?
There is a difference of 57 calories per 100g between the two products.
