Head-to-Head Analysis

Chocolate Covered Trio Squares vs Deli-Sliced Hot Pepper Rings

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Chocolate Covered Trio Squares

Chocolate Covered Trio Squares

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Deli-Sliced Hot Pepper Rings

Deli-Sliced Hot Pepper Rings

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
464 kcal
Energy
33 kcal
28.6g
Sugars
0g
28.6g
Fat
0g
10.7g
Protein
0g
0.7g
Salt
2.6g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Chocolate Covered Trio Squares and Deli-Sliced Hot Pepper Rings side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Chocolate Covered Trio Squares is the more energy-dense option here, packing 431 more calories per 100g than Deli-Sliced Hot Pepper Rings. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Chocolate Covered Trio Squares contains significantly more sugar (28.6g) compared to the milder Deli-Sliced Hot Pepper Rings (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Deli-Sliced Hot Pepper Rings is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Chocolate Covered Trio Squares offers a protein boost with 10.7g per 100g, outperforming Deli-Sliced Hot Pepper Rings in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Chocolate Covered Trio Squares or Deli-Sliced Hot Pepper Rings?

It depends on your goals. Chocolate Covered Trio Squares has 464 calories, while Deli-Sliced Hot Pepper Rings has 33 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Chocolate Covered Trio Squares vegan?

No, Chocolate Covered Trio Squares is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Chocolate Covered Trio Squares and Deli-Sliced Hot Pepper Rings?

There is a difference of 431 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.