Head-to-Head Analysis

Chocolate Espresso vs Sweet Fish

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Chocolate Espresso

Chocolate Espresso

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Sweet Fish

Sweet Fish

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
411 kcal
Energy
260 kcal
8.9g
Sugars
6g
17.9g
Fat
0g
25g
Protein
0g
0.3g
Salt
0.5g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Chocolate Espresso and Sweet Fish side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Chocolate Espresso is the more energy-dense option here, packing 151 more calories per 100g than Sweet Fish. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Chocolate Espresso contains significantly more sugar (8.93g) compared to the milder Sweet Fish (6g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Sweet Fish is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Chocolate Espresso offers a protein boost with 25g per 100g, outperforming Sweet Fish in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Chocolate Espresso or Sweet Fish?

It depends on your goals. Chocolate Espresso has 411 calories, while Sweet Fish has 260 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Chocolate Espresso vegan?

No, Chocolate Espresso is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Chocolate Espresso and Sweet Fish?

There is a difference of 151 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.