Head-to-Head Analysis

Chocolate flavored creme filled cakes swiss rolls vs Blue corn tortilla chips

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Chocolate flavored creme filled cakes swiss rolls

Chocolate flavored creme filled cakes swiss rolls

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Blue corn tortilla chips

Blue corn tortilla chips

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
311 kcal
Energy
535.7 kcal
33.8g
Sugars
0g
12.2g
Fat
28.6g
4.1g
Protein
7.1g
0.6g
Salt
0.7g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Chocolate flavored creme filled cakes swiss rolls and Blue corn tortilla chips side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Chocolate flavored creme filled cakes swiss rolls is the clear winner. With 225 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Chocolate flavored creme filled cakes swiss rolls contains significantly more sugar (33.8g) compared to the milder Blue corn tortilla chips (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Blue corn tortilla chips is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Chocolate flavored creme filled cakes swiss rolls or Blue corn tortilla chips?

It depends on your goals. Chocolate flavored creme filled cakes swiss rolls has 311 calories, while Blue corn tortilla chips has 535.71428571429 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Chocolate flavored creme filled cakes swiss rolls vegan?

No, Chocolate flavored creme filled cakes swiss rolls is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Chocolate flavored creme filled cakes swiss rolls and Blue corn tortilla chips?

There is a difference of 225 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.