Head-to-Head Analysis

Chocolate hazelnut creme filled wafer rolls vs Big Red Cinnamon Gum

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Chocolate hazelnut creme filled wafer rolls

Chocolate hazelnut creme filled wafer rolls

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Big Red Cinnamon Gum

Big Red Cinnamon Gum

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
480 kcal
Energy
400 kcal
44g
Sugars
80g
18g
Fat
0g
4g
Protein
0g
0.6g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Chocolate hazelnut creme filled wafer rolls and Big Red Cinnamon Gum side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Chocolate hazelnut creme filled wafer rolls is the more energy-dense option here, packing 80 more calories per 100g than Big Red Cinnamon Gum. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Chocolate hazelnut creme filled wafer rolls takes the lead with only 44g of sugar per 100g, whereas Big Red Cinnamon Gum contains 80g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Chocolate hazelnut creme filled wafer rolls offers a protein boost with 4g per 100g, outperforming Big Red Cinnamon Gum in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Chocolate hazelnut creme filled wafer rolls or Big Red Cinnamon Gum?

It depends on your goals. Chocolate hazelnut creme filled wafer rolls has 480 calories, while Big Red Cinnamon Gum has 400 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Chocolate hazelnut creme filled wafer rolls vegan?

No, Chocolate hazelnut creme filled wafer rolls is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Chocolate hazelnut creme filled wafer rolls and Big Red Cinnamon Gum?

There is a difference of 80 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.