Head-to-Head Analysis

Chocolate instant reduced calorie pudding & pie filling vs Blueberry Oatmilk Skyr

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Chocolate instant reduced calorie pudding & pie filling

Chocolate instant reduced calorie pudding & pie filling

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Blueberry Oatmilk Skyr

Blueberry Oatmilk Skyr

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
300 kcal
Energy
106 kcal
0g
Sugars
6.3g
0g
Fat
2.8g
0g
Protein
8.5g
9.3g
Salt
0.2g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Chocolate instant reduced calorie pudding & pie filling and Blueberry Oatmilk Skyr side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Chocolate instant reduced calorie pudding & pie filling is the more energy-dense option here, packing 194 more calories per 100g than Blueberry Oatmilk Skyr. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

In terms of sugar control, Chocolate instant reduced calorie pudding & pie filling takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Blueberry Oatmilk Skyr contains 6.34g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Chocolate instant reduced calorie pudding & pie filling or Blueberry Oatmilk Skyr?

It depends on your goals. Chocolate instant reduced calorie pudding & pie filling has 300 calories, while Blueberry Oatmilk Skyr has 106 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Chocolate instant reduced calorie pudding & pie filling vegan?

No, Chocolate instant reduced calorie pudding & pie filling is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Chocolate instant reduced calorie pudding & pie filling and Blueberry Oatmilk Skyr?

There is a difference of 194 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.