Head-to-Head Analysis

Chocolate lava cakes - caramel vs Soft Baked Minis, Double Chocolate Brownie

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Chocolate lava cakes - caramel

Chocolate lava cakes - caramel

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Soft Baked Minis, Double Chocolate Brownie

Soft Baked Minis, Double Chocolate Brownie

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
416 kcal
Energy
392.9 kcal
33.3g
Sugars
28.6g
24.4g
Fat
17.9g
5.6g
Protein
3.6g
0.5g
Salt
0.7g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Chocolate lava cakes - caramel and Soft Baked Minis, Double Chocolate Brownie side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Chocolate lava cakes - caramel is the more energy-dense option here, packing 23 more calories per 100g than Soft Baked Minis, Double Chocolate Brownie. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Chocolate lava cakes - caramel contains significantly more sugar (33.3g) compared to the milder Soft Baked Minis, Double Chocolate Brownie (28.57g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Soft Baked Minis, Double Chocolate Brownie is undeniably the healthier pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Chocolate lava cakes - caramel or Soft Baked Minis, Double Chocolate Brownie?

It depends on your goals. Chocolate lava cakes - caramel has 416 calories, while Soft Baked Minis, Double Chocolate Brownie has 392.86 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Chocolate lava cakes - caramel vegan?

No, Chocolate lava cakes - caramel is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Chocolate lava cakes - caramel and Soft Baked Minis, Double Chocolate Brownie?

There is a difference of 23 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.