Head-to-Head Analysis

Chocolate Milk vs Humm Probiotic Kombucha Strawberry Blossom

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Chocolate Milk

Chocolate Milk

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Humm Probiotic Kombucha Strawberry Blossom

Humm Probiotic Kombucha Strawberry Blossom

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
62.5 kcal
Energy
8.5 kcal
9.2g
Sugars
2g
1g
Fat
0g
3.3g
Protein
0g
0.2g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Chocolate Milk and Humm Probiotic Kombucha Strawberry Blossom side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Chocolate Milk is the more energy-dense option here, packing 54 more calories per 100g than Humm Probiotic Kombucha Strawberry Blossom. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Chocolate Milk contains significantly more sugar (9.17g) compared to the milder Humm Probiotic Kombucha Strawberry Blossom (1.9718309859155g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Humm Probiotic Kombucha Strawberry Blossom is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Chocolate Milk offers a protein boost with 3.33g per 100g, outperforming Humm Probiotic Kombucha Strawberry Blossom in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Chocolate Milk or Humm Probiotic Kombucha Strawberry Blossom?

It depends on your goals. Chocolate Milk has 62.5 calories, while Humm Probiotic Kombucha Strawberry Blossom has 8.4507042253521 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Chocolate Milk vegan?

No, Chocolate Milk is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Chocolate Milk and Humm Probiotic Kombucha Strawberry Blossom?

There is a difference of 54 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.