CHOCOLATE ORGANIC LOWFAT MILK vs Silk Organic Soy Unsweet
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
CHOCOLATE ORGANIC LOWFAT MILK
Silk Organic Soy Unsweet
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing CHOCOLATE ORGANIC LOWFAT MILK and Silk Organic Soy Unsweet side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, CHOCOLATE ORGANIC LOWFAT MILK is the clear winner. With 16 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
However, watch out for the sugar content. CHOCOLATE ORGANIC LOWFAT MILK contains significantly more sugar (9.32g) compared to the milder Silk Organic Soy Unsweet (0.00001g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Silk Organic Soy Unsweet is undeniably the healthier pick.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: CHOCOLATE ORGANIC LOWFAT MILK or Silk Organic Soy Unsweet?
It depends on your goals. CHOCOLATE ORGANIC LOWFAT MILK has 63.6 calories, while Silk Organic Soy Unsweet has 80 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is CHOCOLATE ORGANIC LOWFAT MILK vegan?
No, CHOCOLATE ORGANIC LOWFAT MILK is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between CHOCOLATE ORGANIC LOWFAT MILK and Silk Organic Soy Unsweet?
There is a difference of 16 calories per 100g between the two products.
