Head-to-Head Analysis

Chocolate protein plus vs Lime Flavored Sparkling Water, Lime

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Package of Chocolate protein plus

Chocolate protein plus

Not Vegan
VS
Top Pick
Package of Lime Flavored Sparkling Water, Lime

Lime Flavored Sparkling Water, Lime

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
87.5 kcal
Energy
0 kcal
10.8g
Sugars
0g
1.5g
Fat
0g
6.7g
Protein
0g
0.1g
Salt
0g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Chocolate protein plus and Lime Flavored Sparkling Water, Lime side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

Chocolate protein plus is the more energy-dense option here, packing 88 more calories per 100g than Lime Flavored Sparkling Water, Lime. If you are looking for sustained energy or fueling a workout, this higher caloric density might be an advantage.

However, watch out for the sugar content. Chocolate protein plus contains significantly more sugar (10.8g) compared to the milder Lime Flavored Sparkling Water, Lime (0g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Lime Flavored Sparkling Water, Lime is undeniably the healthier pick.

Looking to build muscle? Chocolate protein plus offers a protein boost with 6.67g per 100g, outperforming Lime Flavored Sparkling Water, Lime in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Chocolate protein plus or Lime Flavored Sparkling Water, Lime?

It depends on your goals. Chocolate protein plus has 87.5 calories, while Lime Flavored Sparkling Water, Lime has 0 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Chocolate protein plus vegan?

No, Chocolate protein plus is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Chocolate protein plus and Lime Flavored Sparkling Water, Lime?

There is a difference of 88 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.