Chocolate Sponge Pudding vs Kellog's Nutrigrain Power-Fuls Soft Baked Oat Bites Strawberry
Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.
Chocolate Sponge Pudding
Kellog's Nutrigrain Power-Fuls Soft Baked Oat Bites Strawberry
The Verdict: Which is Better?
When placing Chocolate Sponge Pudding and Kellog's Nutrigrain Power-Fuls Soft Baked Oat Bites Strawberry side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.
For calorie-conscious consumers, Chocolate Sponge Pudding is the clear winner. With 57 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.
However, watch out for the sugar content. Chocolate Sponge Pudding contains significantly more sugar (28.5g) compared to the milder Kellog's Nutrigrain Power-Fuls Soft Baked Oat Bites Strawberry (22.5g). If you are monitoring your insulin levels or trying to cut down on sweets, Kellog's Nutrigrain Power-Fuls Soft Baked Oat Bites Strawberry is undeniably the healthier pick.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is healthier: Chocolate Sponge Pudding or Kellog's Nutrigrain Power-Fuls Soft Baked Oat Bites Strawberry?
It depends on your goals. Chocolate Sponge Pudding has 343 calories, while Kellog's Nutrigrain Power-Fuls Soft Baked Oat Bites Strawberry has 400 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.
Is Chocolate Sponge Pudding vegan?
No, Chocolate Sponge Pudding is not certified vegan.
What is the calorie difference between Chocolate Sponge Pudding and Kellog's Nutrigrain Power-Fuls Soft Baked Oat Bites Strawberry?
There is a difference of 57 calories per 100g between the two products.
