Head-to-Head Analysis

Chuck Roast vs RXBAR Blueberry

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Chuck Roast

Chuck Roast

Not Vegan
VS
Package of RXBAR Blueberry

RXBAR Blueberry

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
268 kcal
Energy
346 kcal
0g
Sugars
28.8g
21.4g
Fat
11.5g
17g
Protein
23.1g
0.2g
Salt
0.7g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Chuck Roast and RXBAR Blueberry side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Chuck Roast is the clear winner. With 78 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Chuck Roast takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas RXBAR Blueberry contains 28.8g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Chuck Roast or RXBAR Blueberry?

Chuck Roast appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Chuck Roast vegan?

No, Chuck Roast is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Chuck Roast and RXBAR Blueberry?

There is a difference of 78 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.