Head-to-Head Analysis

Chuck Roast vs Miniatures coconut & almond chocolate candy bar

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Chuck Roast

Chuck Roast

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Miniatures coconut & almond chocolate candy bar

Miniatures coconut & almond chocolate candy bar

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
268 kcal
Energy
481 kcal
0g
Sugars
48.1g
21.4g
Fat
25.9g
17g
Protein
3.7g
0.2g
Salt
0.3g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Chuck Roast and Miniatures coconut & almond chocolate candy bar side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Chuck Roast is the clear winner. With 213 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

In terms of sugar control, Chuck Roast takes the lead with only 0g of sugar per 100g, whereas Miniatures coconut & almond chocolate candy bar contains 48.1g. Lower sugar content is often linked to better metabolic health.

Looking to build muscle? Chuck Roast offers a protein boost with 17g per 100g, outperforming Miniatures coconut & almond chocolate candy bar in this category.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Chuck Roast or Miniatures coconut & almond chocolate candy bar?

Chuck Roast appears to be the healthier option generally, as it has less sugar and fewer calories.

Is Chuck Roast vegan?

No, Chuck Roast is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Chuck Roast and Miniatures coconut & almond chocolate candy bar?

There is a difference of 213 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.