Head-to-Head Analysis

Chunk Light Tuna vs Kirkland albacore solid white tuna in water of cans

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Chunk Light Tuna

Chunk Light Tuna

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Kirkland albacore solid white tuna in water of cans

Kirkland albacore solid white tuna in water of cans

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
63.4 kcal
Energy
137 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
0.7g
Fat
2.6g
13.4g
Protein
28.1g
0.6g
Salt
0.8g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Chunk Light Tuna and Kirkland albacore solid white tuna in water of cans side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Chunk Light Tuna is the clear winner. With 74 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Chunk Light Tuna or Kirkland albacore solid white tuna in water of cans?

It depends on your goals. Chunk Light Tuna has 63.380281690141 calories, while Kirkland albacore solid white tuna in water of cans has 137 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Chunk Light Tuna vegan?

No, Chunk Light Tuna is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Chunk Light Tuna and Kirkland albacore solid white tuna in water of cans?

There is a difference of 74 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.