Head-to-Head Analysis

Chunk Light Tuna in Vegetable Oil vs Bela, lightly smoked portuguese sardines in cayenne pepper flavored extract virgin olive oil

Wondering which one to pick? We analyzed the nutritional profile, ingredients, and vegan status to help you decide.

Top Pick
Package of Chunk Light Tuna in Vegetable Oil

Chunk Light Tuna in Vegetable Oil

Not Vegan
VS
Package of Bela, lightly smoked portuguese sardines in cayenne pepper flavored extract virgin olive oil

Bela, lightly smoked portuguese sardines in cayenne pepper flavored extract virgin olive oil

Not Vegan
Nutritional Facts (per 100g)
141.6 kcal
Energy
200 kcal
0g
Sugars
0g
8g
Fat
11.8g
17.7g
Protein
23.5g
0.8g
Salt
0.6g

The Verdict: Which is Better?

When placing Chunk Light Tuna in Vegetable Oil and Bela, lightly smoked portuguese sardines in cayenne pepper flavored extract virgin olive oil side-by-side, the nutritional differences become quite clear. Both products cater to specific dietary needs, but picking the right one depends on whether you are prioritizing weight loss, muscle gain, or clean eating.

For calorie-conscious consumers, Chunk Light Tuna in Vegetable Oil is the clear winner. With 58 fewer calories per 100g than its competitor, it allows for more volume while keeping your energy intake in check.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is healthier: Chunk Light Tuna in Vegetable Oil or Bela, lightly smoked portuguese sardines in cayenne pepper flavored extract virgin olive oil?

It depends on your goals. Chunk Light Tuna in Vegetable Oil has 141.59292035398 calories, while Bela, lightly smoked portuguese sardines in cayenne pepper flavored extract virgin olive oil has 200 calories. Check the detailed table above for sugar and fat content.

Is Chunk Light Tuna in Vegetable Oil vegan?

No, Chunk Light Tuna in Vegetable Oil is not certified vegan.

What is the calorie difference between Chunk Light Tuna in Vegetable Oil and Bela, lightly smoked portuguese sardines in cayenne pepper flavored extract virgin olive oil?

There is a difference of 58 calories per 100g between the two products.

Data source: Open Food Facts. Comparisons are generated automatically based on nutritional values per 100g.